FRONT

SIDE

POLE
| Passenger compartment structure | ESTABLE |
|---|---|
| Voluntary UNECE95 test | Performed - Approved |
In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were well protected by the driver and passenger airbags. The driver and passenger chests received adequate protection. The driver knee airbag improved knee protection. Both seatbelts were equipped with pretensioners and load limiters. The passengers knees areas did not show high risk structures. The bodyshell was rated as stable and was capable of withstanding further loading. In the side impact the Ranger could keep the biomechanical values of the driver below the limits offering a good protection to all the body of the driver. The car does not have ESC as standard. Side pole impact test was not performed. The model does not offer side head protection airbags as standard.could keep the biomeechanical values of the driver below the limits offering a good protection to all the body of the driver. The car does not have ESC as standard. Side pole impact test was not performed, The models does not offer side head protection airbags as standard. In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were well protected by the driver and passenger airbags. The driver and passenger chests received adequate protection. The driver knee airbag improved knee protection. Both seatbelts were equipped with pretensioners and load limiters. The passengers knees areas did not show high risk structures. The bodyshell was rated as stable and was capable of withstanding further loading. In the side impact the Ranger could keep the biomeechanical values of the driver below the limits offering a good protection to all the body of the driver. The car does not have ESC as standard. Side pole impact test was not performed, The models does not offer side head protection airbags as standard.
See protocol