TEST 2012
Internal combustion
| Voluntary UNECE95 test | Performed - Approved |
|---|
In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were both well protected by the restrain system. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia and centre console that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The structure was able to withstand further loadings
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Bobsy G0 | Vulnerable / Poor | 0+ | Belted | |
| 3-year-old child | Bobsy G1 | Vulnerable / Poor | 1 | ISOFIX |
The Isofix child seat for the 3 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and protected the 3 year old child well. The belted CRS for the 11/2 year old child was able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and adequately well the child. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle did not have warning labels explaining the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active aribag.
See protocol| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 4 door hatchBack | 2012 |
| Brazil | Kg 1342 |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | YES |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | YES |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | NO |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | YES |