TEST 2012
Internal combustion
| Voluntary UNECE95 test | Performed - Approved |
|---|
In the frontal impact the driver and passenger heads were both well protected by the restrain system. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia and centre console that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The bodyshell showed that it can withstand further loadings.
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Honda Romer Babysafe plus | Protected / Good | 0+ | ISOFIX | |
| 3-year-old child | Honda Romer Duo Plus | Protected / Fair | 1 | ISOFIX |
The Isofix child seat for the 3 year old child and the 11/2 year old child were able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and protected both child well. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle had warning labels explaining the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active aribag, but this warning was not permanetly attached to the vehicle..
See protocol| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 4 door sedan | 2012 |
| Brazil | 1380 Kg |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | YES |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | YES |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | NO |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | YES |