Child Occupant - The child seat for the 10-year-old child was installed forward facing using the adult seatbelt (non ISOFIX CRS). Together with the adult seatbelt, was capable of preventing submarining, neck exposure, ejection but could not prevent high head injury risk offering poor neck protection and poor chest protection during the frontal impact. The 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg and showed full protection in the frontal impact. Side Impact: The 3-year-old CRS could not prevent the head exposure during the crash and the 10-year-old CRS could not prevent high head decelerations and exposure due to the lack of side head impact protection resulting in both cases with zero points. The installation of CRS scored zero point due to gabarit fail installation, not having i-Size approved and marked seating positions, and not having the possibility to disconnect passenger airbags when a rearward CRS is placed in the front passenger seat. All seating positions are equipped with three-point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. All this explains the zero points in this box.
See protocol