TEST 2012
Internal combustion
| Voluntary UNECE95 test | Performed - Approved |
|---|
In the frontal impact the driver head bottoms out the airbag. The chest was protected well. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees. The bodyshell showed that it can withstand further loadings.
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Ford Romer Babysafe plus | Protected / Good | 0+ | ISOFIX | |
| 3-year-old child | Ford Romer Duo Plus | Protected / Good | 1 | ISOFIX |
The Isofix child seat for the 3 year old child and the 1 ½ year old child were able to prevent excessive forward movement during the impact and protected both child well. The installation instructions on both child seats were sufficient and permanently attached to the seat. The vehicle did not give any warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag.
See protocol| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 4 door hatchback | 2012 |
| Mexico | 1399 Kg |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | YES |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | YES |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | NO |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | YES |