Suzuki Baleno + 2 Airbags

16.91 points · 42%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER12.65 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.84 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)6.42 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	NO TEST
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	0
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver’s and passenger’s chest showed adequate protection. Driver’s and passenger’s knees showed marginal protection as they can impact dangerous structures behind the fascia. Driver’s and passenger’s tibias showed adequate protection. Footwell area showed stable performance. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it is capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, abdomen and pelvis showed good protection but chest showed weak protection due to the lack of side protection airbags. Side Pole Impact: test was not performed as the car does not offer standard side head protection airbags. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: The car proved to meet regulation UN32. AEB City: the car does not offer AEB City and the car does not meet the minimum passive safety protection to eventually consider AEB for scoring. Rescue sheet: Not available according to Latin NCAP criteria.

See protocol

32.08 points · 65%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
23.72	4.36	4.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie i-Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 7.72 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie i-Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 8.00 Side (max. 4): 4.00	i-SIZE	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Fail	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the Q1.5 child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered almost full protection. The 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure offering full protection. Side Impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. Front passenger seating position failed for the installation of all CRSs, while most of the other positions passed. The car has ISOFIX anchorages as standard, meeting also i-Size requirements. All seating positions are equipped with three point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meet Latin NCAP requirements. The car does not have passenger airbag disconnection.

See protocol

23.17 points · 48%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

23.17 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

DOES NOT MEET

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	16.39	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	0.78	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Minimum speed range (km/h)

Maximum speed range (km/h)

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

Adult running, farside, 50%

Adult walking, nearside, 25%

Adult walking, nearside, 75%

Child running, nearside obscured, 50%

Human Machine Interaction

COMMENTS:

The car proved to meet Pedestrian protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of head impact areas with adequate to marginal protection. It showed poor protection towards the A-pillars and a small portion of good protection in the middle of the hood. Upper leg performance was poor in most of the areas and adequate towards the edges. Lower leg performance showed good protection. AEB VRU: the car does not offer AEB VRU.

See protocol

25.00 points · 58%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	-	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		10.00
Visual	OK	OK		OK
Audible	OK	OK		OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
LDW is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements
LKA is not available according to Latin NCAP requirements
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				-
ESC IS STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				95
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				75
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

SBR: The car offers SBR in all seating position and they meet Latin NCAP requirements. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 95 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 75 km/h under Consumer Moose test. SA: the car dos not offer a speed limitation device. BSD: not available according to Latin NCAP requirements. LSS and RED: not available under Latin NCAP requirements. AEB IU: Not available.

See protocol

Car information
Baleno	1213
5 door Hatch	India
2025	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	NO	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	YES STANDARD
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	NO PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION
Pedestrian AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
City AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
Interurban AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
Speed assistance system	NOT AVAILABLE
Lane assistance system	NOT AVAILABLE

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit