After the side pole impact test, there was fire noticed on the un-crashed side of the vehicle, in the pretensioner area. The manufacturer was notified about the incident, investigated the occurrence, discovered a non-conformity and launched a safety recall on April 2022, in all affected markets. Latin NCAP aims to focus on the root cause, the OEM’s experience leads to the opinion that aiming to the effects resulting from the fire is the right solution. Although the OEM’s decision is not in line with Latin NCAP’s recommendation, Latin NCAP acknowledges the OEM’s responsibility and accountability.
Adult Occupant
36.43 points 91%FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER
15 / 16 p
FRONT PASSENGER
DRIVER
WIPLASH REAR IMPACT
2.54 / 3 p
WHIPLASH
SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (car)
7.66 / 8 p
SIDE
SIDE POLE IMPACT TEST
6.64 / 8 p
POLE
Protection
GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POORFUEL LEAKAGE DETECTED IN ANY TEST CONFIGURATION
NOCOMMENTS
Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver and passenger chest showed adequate protection. Driver knees showed adequate protection as they can impact with dangerous structures behind the fascia and passenger’s knees showed good protection. Driver tibias showed adequate and good protection, and passengers tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated as stable. Side impact: Head, abdomen and pelvis protection was good, chest protection was adequate. Side Pole Impact: head and pelvis protection was good, chest protection was marginal and abdomen protection was adequate. There was fire noticed on the un-crashed side of the vehicle, and the buckle could not be released according to Latin NCAP requirements. Whiplash: the seat showed good protection to the adult neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car offers AEB City meeting Latin NCAP technical and availability requirements. Rescue sheet: available according to Latin NCAP criteria.
See protocolChild Occupant
45.00 points 92%CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM
24.00
12.00
9.00
18 month old child Joyson (Takata) MIDI
Joyson (Takata) MIDI
3 years old child Joyson (Takata) MIDI
Joyson (Takata) MIDI
SRI installation assessment
2nd row
Reference list
RIGHT
LEFT
CENTER
RIGHT
lista de ref.
Group 0+
Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable
derecha
Pass
centro
Pass
izquierda
Exempt
derecha
Pass
lista de ref.
Group 0+
Roemer Baby Safe
derecha
Exempt
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
lista de ref.
Group 0+
Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS
derecha
Pass
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
lista de ref.
Group I
Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF
derecha
Pass
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
lista de ref.
Group I
Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF
derecha
Pass
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
lista de ref.
Group II/III
Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3
derecha
Exempt
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
lista de ref.
Group II/III
Graco Cadeira Nautilus
derecha
Pass
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
Manufacturer
RIGHT
LEFT
CENTER
RIGHT
lista de ref.
Q1.5
Joyson (Takata) MIDI ISOFIX/LEG
derecha
Exempt
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
Q3
Joyson (Takata) MIDI ISOFIX/LEG
derecha
Exempt
izquierda
Pass
centro
Exempt
derecha
Pass
*Fail only due to failed marking
COMMENTS
The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered good protection. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS prevented the head exposure offering full protection. Side impact: Both CRSs offered full protection. All of the CRSs tested for installation passed. The car has ISOFIX anchorages as standard, meeting also i-size requirements. All seating positions are equipped with three-point seatbelts. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. The car has passenger airbag disconnection via manual switch.
See protocolVulnerable road users
25.99 Points 54%PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (pasive)
AEB PEDESTRIAN
0.0015 %
PERFORMANCE
COMMENTS
The car meets Pedestrian protection UN127 regulations. The car showed majority of areas with good to adequate and marginal protection levels. Upper leg performance was poor towards the sides, lower leg performance was good. AEB VRU: the car does not offer AEB VRU even as optional.
See protocolSafety Assist Systems
35.77 points 83%SPEED ASSISTENCE
3.00SEAT BELT REMINDER
10.00LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS
PERFORMANCE
ROAD EDGE DETECTION
(this feature scores only if it meets the fittment rates required)BLIND SPOT DETECTION
(this feature scores only if it meets the fittment rates required) 1ESC
15.00ADAC MOOSE TEST
MOOOSE Test: Consumer testing
AEB Interurban
6.77PERFORMANCE
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
COMMENTS
SBR: The offers SBR in all positions. ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. The Moose test performance reached a maximum of 95 km/h under ADAC Moose test and 70 km/h under Consumer magazine Moose test. SA: the car offers a speed limitation device that fulfils Latin NCAP requirements. BSD: The car offers BSD. LSS and RED: The car does not offer LSS and/or RED. AEB Interurban: The car offers AEB Inter Urban offering good performance and meeting Latin NCAP availability requirements.
See protocolCar Details
Tracker
5 door SUV
2022
1455
Brazil & Argentina
Latin NCAP market