Hyundai Accent + 1 Airbag

3.69 points · 9%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER0 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT1.57 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)5.11 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACTNO TEST

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	0
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver’s chest showed adequate protection and passenger’s chest showed poor protection leading to zero points in frontal crash. Driver’s knees and one passenger knee showed marginal protection as they can impact with dangerous structures behind the fascia while one passenger’s knee showed good protection. Driver’s tibias showed adequate protection and passenger’s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it is capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head and chest showed marginal protection while abdomen showed adequate protection and pelvis good protection. Side Pole Impact: was not performed as the car does not offer side head protection as standard. Whiplash: the protection to the neck was marginal. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the car does not offer optional AEB city following Latin NCAP fitment rate. Rescue sheet: does not meet Latin NCAP requirements.

See protocol

6.21 points · 13%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
0.00	3.21	3.00

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 0.00 Side (max. 4): 0.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joie Spin 360	Frontal (max. 8): 0.00 Side (max. 4): 0.00	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Fail	Fail	Exempt	Fail *
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Fail	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Fail	Fail	Exempt	Fail *
Manufacturer Q3	Joie Spin 360 - ISOFIX/LEG	Fail	Fail	Exempt	Fail *

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The child seat for the 3-year-old child was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. It was capable of preventing head exposure and offered good protection. Side Impact: the CRS offered full protection. The Q1.5 was installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg, the CRS prevented the head exposure offering full protection. Rear backrest unlatching can offer risks. Side Impact: the CRS offered full protection. The manufacturer refused to recommend CRS which leads to zero points in dynamic test. Some of the CRSs tested for installation failed. Despite having standard ISOFIX anchorages in rear outboard positions marking was not according to Latin NCAP criteria. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat meets Latin NCAP requirements. Passenger airbag could not be disconnected in the case that a rearward facing CRS is installed in the front passenger seat.

See protocol

25.49 points · 53%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15.00 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

DOES NOT MEET

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	11.77	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	6.00	6
Lower leg impact	4.40	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

0.00 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car does not prove to meet pedestrian protection UN regulations. The car showed average protection to pedestrians in the head, good protection to the upper leg and adequate to weak protection to the lower leg. AEB VRU: not available according to fitment requirements.

See protocol

3.00 points · 7%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	0.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		3.00
Visual	OK	NOT OK		NOT OK
Audible	OK	NOT OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				-
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				-
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				-
-
ESC				-
-
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				-
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				-
INTERURBAN AEB				-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		-
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		-
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		-
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	-		-
Car in front brakes hard	-		-

COMMENTS:

The car does not offer ESC as standard. SBR: the car offers front driver SBR only. SA: the car does not offer a speed limitation device. BSD: The car does not offer BSD as standard. LSS and RED: the car does not offer these technologies. AEB Interurban: The car does not have AEB interurban.

See protocol

Car information
Accent	1332
4 door Sedan	Mexico & India
2021	Latin NCAP market

Safety information	Driver	Passenger	Rear
Frontal protection
Frontal airbag	YES STANDARD	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT APPLICABLE
Seat belt pretensioner	YES STANDARD	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
Seat belt load limiter	YES STANDARD	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Knee airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT APPLICABLE
Side protection
Side head curtain airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
Side head-thorax airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Side chest airbag	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Side pelvis airbag	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Child protection
ISOFIX	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	YES OUTBOARD SEATS
Integrated CRS	NOT APPLICABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NO
Airbag cut-off switch	NOT APPLICABLE	NO	NOT APPLICABLE
Safety Assist Systems
Seat belt reminder (SBR)	YES STANDARD	NO - JUST OPTIONAL	NOT AVAILABLE
Other safety systems
Standard ESC	NO - JUST OPTIONAL
GTR 9-UN 127 Pedestrian protection	DOES NOT MEET
Pedestrian AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
City AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
Interurban AEB	NOT AVAILABLE
Speed assistance system	NOT AVAILABLE
Lane assistance system	NOT AVAILABLE

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Tit