Volkswagen Taos + 6 Airbags

36.09 points · 90%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

FRONTAL OFFSET DEFORMABLE BARRIER12.8 / 16 p

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT2.68 / 3 p

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)8 / 8 p

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT7.6 / 8 p

SIDE POLE IMPACT

UN R32 (max. 1 point)	1
AEB City (max. 3 points)	3
Rescue Sheet (max. 1 point)	1
Fuel leakage detected after crash test	NO

COMMENTS:

Frontal impact: The protection offered to the driver and passenger head and neck was good. Driver chest showed marginal protection and passenger’s chest showed adequate protection. Driver’s and passenger’s knees showed good protection. Driver’s tibias showed adequate protection and passenger´s tibias showed good protection. Footwell area was rated as stable. The bodyshell was rated as stable and it is capable of withstanding further loadings. Side impact: Head, abdomen, chest and pelvis protection was good. Side Pole Impact: Head, abdomen and pelvis protection was good, while chest protection was adequate. Whiplash: showed good protection to the neck. UN R32: the car meets the rear impact structure requirements. AEB City: the offers AEB city according to fitment requirements and scored full points in the tests. Rescue sheet content is ok and meeting Latin NCAP requirements. All of the above explains the 90.23% of points matching a level of 5 stars.

See protocol

44.00 points · 90%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Dynamic test score (max. 24)	CRS installation score (max. 12)	Vehicle assessment score (max. 13)
24	12	8

Occupant	Child restraint system	Score	CRS type	Installation	Position
18-month-old child	Britax Roemer Baby Safe + ISOFIX BASE	Frontal (max. 8): 8 Side (max. 4): 4	0+	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing
3-year-old child	Joyson (Takata) MIDI	Frontal (max. 8): 8 Side (max. 4): 4	0+/I	ISOFIX/LEG	Rearward facing

Installation and equipment assessment
Feature	Front passenger	2nd row outboard	2nd row centre
ISOFIX	NOT AVAILABLE	YES STANDARD	NOT AVAILABLE
i-Size	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE
Integrated CRS	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE	NOT AVAILABLE

CRS installation assessment

		2nd row
Reference list		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Group 0+	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group 0+	Roemer Baby Safe	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Group 0+	Bébé Confort Streety Fix / Maxi Cosi Citi SPS	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Peg Perego Viaggio Switchable FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group I	Graco Cadeira Nautilus FWF	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Burigotto Multipla 1,2,3	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass
Group II/III	Graco Cadeira Nautilus	Pass	Pass	Pass	Pass

		2nd row
Manufacturer		RIGHT	LEFT	CENTRE	RIGHT
Manufacturer Q1.5	Britax Roemer Baby Safe ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass
Manufacturer Q3	Joyson (Takata) MIDI ISOFIX/LEG	Exempt	Pass	Exempt	Pass

*Fail only due to failed marking

COMMENTS:

The CRSs used for the Q3 dummy were JSS Midi, offered by VW under part number 3118897BVL-AA and for the Q1.5 the Britax Roemer Baby safe + ISOFIX base offered under part number 3118899P15-AA/5G0.019.907.A”. The child seats for both child dummies were installed rearward facing using ISOFIX anchorages and support leg. Both were capable of preventing head exposure during forward movement offering full protection to both child occupants. Side impact protection was good, achieving full score in side impact protection. All tested CRSs in installation pass. Marking was according to Latin NCAP requirements however only for ISOFIX and not an I-Size marking. Airbag warning when a rearward CRS is installed in the passenger seat was permanently attached to the surface and according to Latin NCAP requirements. Passenger airbag could be disconnected in the case that a rearward facing CRS is installed in the front passenger seat. All of the above explains the 89.8% of points matching a level of 5 stars.

See protocol

Las propuestas académicas
para inscribirse son:

Área Tango:

Área Folclore:

Área Danza Contemporánea:

Danza Clásica (Ballet):

22.49 points · 61%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION (PASSIVE)

15 points

UN127 pedestrian protection regulation

MEETS UN127 REGULATION

	Points	Maximum score
Head impact	13.56	24
Upper leg impact (pelvis)	0.00	6
Lower leg impact	6.00	6

PEDESTRIAN AEB

6.60 points

Pedestrian balancing factor (until 2022)

System name

Front Assist

Minimum speed range (km/h)

4 km/h

Maximum speed range (km/h)

60 km/h

Road user type

Adult

Impact speed

8 km/h

System use

NON OBSTRUCTED VIEW

PERFORMANCE

Summary

Percentage

COMMENTS:

The car meets UN127 Pedestrian protection regulations. The car showed average pedestrian protection, marginal head protection, poor upper leg protection and good lower leg protection. The car strategy aims to prevent hitting pedestrians and VRU with the interaction of the AEB VRU in those versions available which is in at least 50% of the sales volume. AEB VRU: available according to fitment rates, the validated performance offers full effectiveness in the validation tests. All of the above explains the 60.61% of points just matching a level of 5 stars.

See protocol

36.57 points · 85%

Protection

GOOD

ADEQUATE

MARGINAL

WEAK

POOR

Warning	Driver	Passenger		Rear passengers
SPEED ASSISTANCE (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)	3.00	SEAT BELT REMINDER (this feature scores only if it is standard in all versions)		10.00
Visual	OK	OK		OK
Audible	OK	OK		NOT OK
LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS				0.00
-
-
System name		-
Functionality		-
Operational from (km/h)		-
Warning		-
LKA Test		-
LDW Test		-
ROAD EDGE DETECTION				0.00
-
BLIND SPOT DETECTION				0.00
-
ESC				15.00
ESC IS STANDARD IN ALL VERSIONS
ESC Meets regulatory requirements of Latin NCAP
ADAC MOOSE TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				90
MOOSE TEST: CONSUMER TEST
Maximum faultless test speed (km/h)				70
INTERURBAN AEB				8.57
System name		Front Assist
Functionality		FCW and AEB
Operational from (km/h)		4
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — AEB		4 km/h - 194 km/h
Operational speed (km/h) Min \| Max — Driver reacts to warning		30 km/h - 194km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — AEB		Crash avoided up to 65 km/h
Approaching a slower moving car — Driver reacts to warning		Crash avoided up to 80 km/h
FOLLOWING A CAR AT SHORT DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance		Avoidance
Car in front brakes hard	Avoidance		Avoidance
FOLLOWING A CAR AT LONG DISTANCE
	AEB		Driver reacts to warning
Car in front brakes gently	Avoidance		Avoidance
Car in front brakes hard	Avoidance		Avoidance

COMMENTS:

ESC: The car offers ESC as standard. Moose test max speed was 90 km/h for the ADAC Moose scenario and 70km/h for the Consumer testing scenario. SBR: the car offers front and rear passengers SBR achieving full score. SA: The car offers standard speed limitation and it meets Latin NCAP requirements. BSD: The car does offer BSD but it was not assessed (*). LSS and RED: this technology was not assessed. AEB Interurban: the car offers AEB Interurban according to fitment requirements and scored almost full points in the tests. All of the above explains the 85.04% of points matching a level of 5 stars.

(*) as from 1/4/2022 momentarily suspended due to microchip shortages

See protocol

Car information
Taos	1683
5 door SUV	Mexico / Argentina
2021	Latin NCAP market

FRONT PASSENGER

DRIVER

WHIPLASH REAR IMPACT

SIDE MOVABLE DEFORMABLE BARRIER TEST (CAR)

SIDE POLE IMPACT

Las propuestas académicas para inscribirse son:

Área Tango:

Área Folclore:

Área Danza Contemporánea:

Danza Clásica (Ballet):

Tit

Las propuestas académicas
para inscribirse son: