TEST 2011
Internal combustion
In the frontal impact the passengers head and chest hit the steering wheel, the rim was teared off the column. There were hazardous structures in the area of the facia that could be impacted by an occupants knees and the protection to the lower legs was poor. The body shell was not capable of withstanding further loading.
See protocol| CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM | Head / Chest | CRS type | Installation | Position | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-month-old child | Ford Romer Babysafe plus | Protected / Good | 0+ | Belted | |
| 3-year-old child | Ford Romer Duo Plus | Protected / Fair | 1 | Belted |
The installation instructions on both child seats were permanently attached to the seat and offered sufficient information. Child dummies were well protected. The vehicle did not give any warnings as to the hazards associated with installing a rearward facing child seat on the front passenger seat with an active airbag (in the car was no passenger airbag available, other versions offer this possibility without any warning label or airbag disabeling). Both Child dummies were protected
See protocol| Car information | |
|---|---|
| 2 door hatchback | 2011 |
| Brazil | 1116kg |
| Latin NCAP market |
| Safety equipment | |
|---|---|
| Driver frontal airbag | NO |
| Front passenger frontal airbag | NO |
| Side head airbags | NO |
| Side body airbags | NO |
| Driver knee airbag | NO |
| Front belt pretensioners | NO |